The digital product market is exploding.
and the real MVP is micro-learnings.
Whoever said digital products were dying, is lying.
The self-taught boom is here, and it’s growing at an astonishing rate. Digital products hit about $124 billion in 2025, and are projected to hit $416 billion by 2030.
That’s a huge YoY growth rate 📈📈 📈
But here’s the wildest part: while the market is growing like crazy, most entrepreneurs are building things that nobody actually buys.
Not because the products are bad, but because they’re solving problems that are too big, too vague, or too far in their buyers future for their people to care about right now.
The entrepreneurs making real money aren’t building comprehensive transformations, they’re solving micro-problems.
And there’s actual data behind why this works.
Here’s a stat that should rewire how you think about what offers you’re building in your business:
Micro-learning content has an 80% completion rate.
Traditional long-form courses? About 20%.
Think about what that actually means. When you create a massive course, 80% of people who buy it never finish. They get overwhelmed. They get lost. They give up.
But when you solve one specific thing in a focused way, 80% of people actually complete it. They get the win. They feel successful. They trust you enough to buy the next thing.
This isn’t about education format, it’s about how human brains actually work. Studies show that people retain 25-60% more information when it’s delivered in small, focused segments.
Sadly, we forget 70% of traditional course content within 24 hours.
Your audience isn’t “lazy” but you’re problem solving process should be.
Digital products thrive on micro-problems.
They also have a unique advantage in that they’re infinitely scalable without the baggage of service delivery. You create it once, and sell it forever. No additional time per customer.
But that same advantage becomes your biggest liability when you build something massive upfront.
A $3,000 course that took you six months to create and nobody buys?
You just lost six months with zero revenue and zero validation.
A $47 guide that took you two weeks to create and sells 100 copies?
You just made $4,700 and proved demand for your next offer.
The math is pretty straight forward: 55% of consumers are tightening budgets right now. They’re not buying transformations, they’re buying solutions to immediate problems. They’ll spend the money, but it needs to solve something they’re dealing with today, not six months from now.
When buyers can’t get clear on exactly what they’re getting and why it matters right now, they don’t buy. Complexity kills conversion.
But micro-problems find and remove the friction.
Let’s break a few big problems into money-making solutions, so you can see how this works in today’s market, shall we?
Let’s say you help people “build their personal brand” (too big). Here’s how you’d break that into micro-problems:
Instead of: “The Complete Personal Branding System” ($997, 12 modules, 6 months, and death by a thousand cuts to complete)
Think:
“Write an Instagram Bio That Actually Converts” ($27, 45 minutes)
“Create Content Pillars That Feel Natural to You” ($47, 33 minutes)
“Turn Your DMs Into Discovery Calls” ($67, 40 60 minutes)
“Pitch Yourself to Podcasts” ($97, 2 hours)
Each one solves a specific problem someone has right now. Each one has a clear outcome. Each one proves you can help before they invest in something bigger.
The person who buys into your micro-problem and gets results are way more likely to buy your higher cost program than someone who’s never worked with you before.
Or let’s say you teach productivity (again, too vague). Break it down:
“Triage Your Inbox in 15 Minutes Every Morning”
“Run Meetings That Don’t Waste Everyone’s Time”
“Batch Your Deep Work Without Burning Out”
“Say No Without Feeling Like an Asshole”
Each one micro problem you create should provide a specific unlock.
Not a complete system.
Just one thing that makes their day better starting tomorrow.
The pattern is always the same: take the massive problem and ask “What’s the first thing someone needs to solve before they can handle the rest?”
That’s your micro-problem. That’s your offer.
The feedback loop is what builds businesses
When 94% of learners prefer short, focused lessons, you know something fundamental has shifted.
People don’t want more. They want better.
They want targeted. They want something they can actually finish and use.
This creates a feedback loop that massive courses never get:
Someone buys your micro-solution → 80% of them complete it → they get a result → they tell you what they need next → you build that → repeat.
You’re not guessing what comes after “module 8” of a course nobody’s finishing.
You’re building exactly what people who already bought from you are literally asking for.
Companies using micro-learning see 28% higher performance metrics and 50% higher engagement compared to traditional formats, because people actually use what they buy. They don’t just buy it and let it rot in their downloads folder.
Your goal isn’t to build the most comprehensive thing.
It’s to build the thing people actually complete, get results from, and come back for more.
They’re already hungry. Our job is to make them eat. One bite at at time.
Mobile app users spent $150 billion on in-app purchases in 2024, with 54% of that going to micro-transactions and smaller purchases.
People are buying more often, but spending less per transaction.
The subscription economy has grown 435% over the past decade, but here’s the shift: alternative payment models like pay-per-use and micro-transactions are growing at 31% annually, faster than subscriptions.
What does this tell you?
People want to buy solutions without massive commitment.
They want to see if you can solve one problem, and if it works, then they will decide what’s next.
The old model was “sell them the expensive thing and hope/who cares if they use it.”
The new model is “sell them the small thing they’ll actually use, then they’ll buy more things.”
The online education market hit $185 billion in 2024 and is growing annually.
But completion rates aren’t really improving, they’re still abysmal for long-form content.
Meanwhile, platforms like TikTok and Instagram have trained entire generations to expect information in small, consumable chunks.
Did you know that 92% of people finish videos under four minutes but only 35% finish hour-long content.
Your audience is operating the way every platform has trained them to operate and we need to adapt or get left behind.
So meet them there.
Solve the micro-problem.
Get them the quick win.
Build trust through completion, not through volume.
Oh, the massive transformation you want to deliver?
You’ll still deliver it.
Just not all at once.
Not in one overwhelming package.
Instead, you’ll deliver it piece by piece, problem by problem, with your audience telling you exactly what they need next.
That’s not a compromise.
That’s just smarter business.




Can confirm I like something small and easy to implement 🙋🏼♀️one thing I always look out for is a private podcast component. I do most of my learning when walking my dog so if I can listen to a podcast and learn on the go, eI’m sold
This found me at just the right time! I’ve been teaching in the long form/signature program format for a few years. In the last couple of months my gut instinct is that this shift is happening-quickly. I’ve been contemplating how best to pivot. It was reaffirming to read your take on this!